Another step into a direction for individual liberty by this White House.

How cute... The name of their new edict is titled, "Paycheck Fairness Act." This is how they are going to collect employee data, sex, race, and national origin. If the sex, race, and culture do not matter, everything being all equal, why collect them. Obviously, they think one is greater than the other. So, they are going to promote one sex over another, one race over another, one age group over another. This is what racism is... Anything that's labeled as "fairness" is based on racism, preselected determined outcome by few at the top at the center. Thus, variable X should follow the path that's right for the variable X. So, if you are a black, you should follow the path for the blacks. If you are an Asian, you should follow the path that's right for the Asians. Companies should have be x number of Asians, y number of blacks, and so on. I can't wait until they preselect kids to become gymnasts and other type of athletes. We are going to have more golds. So, the government can pay off its debts. After they win, the White House can have more parties along with its celebutard friends. Annual White House correspondents dinner would be bit more bling-ed. Maybe, they will give away free iPods with the President's speech in them. I hope they liked them as much as the Queen of UK liked them. Would they be worth more if those were actioned off on eBay?

These people are playing their version the Sim City and the Sims with our lives. They want to control every part of our lives as possible. They already tell us how we should flush our toilets, what kind of light bulbs we should use, and type of papers we should use to wipe asses. The level of control freakness is just crazy. These people can't leave others alone. Isn't this a psychological problem, wanting to control others? This is really insidious. While conservatives out law certain acts but.. these bans do not cost people their time/life. Also, often, there are no previous acts in which the cost can be measured. Meaning, prohibitions rarely have cost associated with them because these prohibitions were not sanctioned before either explicitly or implicitly. Goodness of these bans isn't important as much as whether these bans cost people time/life. In Contrast, when these people pass laws, they do cost people's time/life. A real difference.... The difference here is that these laws make people permanent indenture servants of the state. This is because, people are constantly giving away their money, which is personal time bartered against the services provided by each person(s). Reduction of personal time/life/money/property reduces person's ability to take risks on their own, thus happiness. Happiness is a risk-based value, and these laws diminishes the pursuit of happiness part of this culture. These laws almost never end. Often, more laws are added to them.. to cover up the previous laws that are obviously flawed.. and they pat themselves on the back how great job they have done with the new laws, and give themselves raises.

How would business go around laws like this? By out-sourcing.... These people don't ask unintended consequences...

When companies out-source.. these knuckle heads in congress are going to pass something akin to "out-source fairness act..." then.. companies will just fold the whole thing together and move out, making their products imports. This is how this White House wants to create jobs... This is their laser like focus on Jobs. Their fulgurated lasers are killing jobs.

Do they not have people who aren't communists or socialists? And they say they aren't socialists or communists... How else would you characterize this type of laws? This law certain isn't capitalist-based laws. Such heavy handed regulation kills jobs, innovations, and everything else that are associated with it while improving nothing.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/69746

Socialism Failure: Burma

Where ever socialism is implement, it seeds poverty, chaos, and inhumanity. Whether you are talking about Vietnam, Zimbabwe, Cuba, Venezuela, or any where... socialism leaves disasters behind that leads to death. Even in USA, people who are under segmented socialist policies suffered and continue to suffer greatly due to socialists good intentions. Their ideas are never to be examined. Only good intentions are measured. These people are truly stupid.

The latest example of this is Burma. Burma isn't very popular country because the country doesn't produce anything significant. The country, once was the leading economy in Asia and the leading rice exporter under Britain is now one of the poorest country in the world after it gained "independence."

as of 2007, their capita per income is under $2000. With the latest cyclone that landed in the country, it made the lunacy of socialism very lucid.

U.N. weather agency forecasts heavy rains in Burma next week...

500,000? Burma death toll 'worse than Tsunami'...

UN halts aid after junta seizes supplies!